Inside my Interview on the Criminally Good Podcast by retired ATF Agent Jenn Eskew
Some interviews feel familiar from the first question. This one did not, in the best possible way.
My 30-minute appearance on The Neil Haley Show Criminally Good Podcast with my friend, retired ATF Agent Jenn Eskew, and her on-air partner, Sherrie, took a different path from my previous interviews. The questions were sharp, thoughtful, and a little unexpected. That made the conversation feel more alive, more personal, and more useful for anyone who enjoys true crime stories that go beyond the headline.
Why this interview stood out
A good interview is not just a list of questions. It is a conversation with tension, timing, and curiosity.
That is what made this episode feel different. Jenn and Sherrie did not simply ask the obvious things. They listened closely, followed the thread, and asked questions that opened up new angles. That kind of rhythm matters, especially in a true crime setting where the subject matter can be serious, emotional, and layered.
The show gave the conversation room to breathe. At about 30 minutes, it is long enough to get into meaningful detail, but short enough to listen to in one sitting. It works well during a drive, a walk, a workout, or a quiet break in the day.
What I appreciated most was the way the questions created a different kind of interview experience. Instead of staying on the surface, the discussion had space for context, reflection, and a few surprises.
Jenn Eskew brings real-world perspective
Jenn Eskew’s background as a retired ATF agent gives the podcast a strong foundation. True crime can easily become sensational when it is handled carelessly. A host with real investigative experience can help steer the conversation toward details that matter.
That does not mean every episode has to sound technical or formal. The strongest true crime conversations often balance expertise with plain language. Listeners want the story, but they also want to understand how people think through evidence, risk, pressure, and human behavior.
Jenn brings that lived perspective to the microphone. She knows that criminal cases are not just plots. They involve real people, real choices, and real consequences.
That kind of background changes the tone of a conversation. It adds weight without making the episode feel heavy. It helps the listener understand why a question matters, not just what the answer is.
Sherrie adds a strong on-air balance
A good cohost can change the whole feel of a podcast. Sherrie brings another voice into the room, and that matters.
In this episode, the partnership between Jenn and Sherrie helped shape the pace. The interview did not feel rushed, but it also did not drag. Their questions moved things forward while still allowing space for a real answer.
That is not always easy to do. Many interviews either jump too quickly from topic to topic or stay too long on one point. Here, the balance felt natural.
That is one reason true crime fans should give their podcast a listen.
Why true crime listeners may enjoy this episode
True crime audiences tend to notice when a conversation feels forced. They also notice when a host is asking questions only from a script. The style of Jenn and Sherrie is natural, laid-back, yet right on target.
Fans of the genre may enjoy it because it includes several things that make a true crime podcast work:
Strong questions
The best moments came from questions that invited more than a yes-or-no answer.
Human context
The discussion paid attention to the people behind the story, not just the facts.
Experienced hosts
Jenn’s background and Sherrie’s on-air presence gave the episode structure and energy.
A manageable length
Thirty minutes is enough time to get into the subject without demanding a full afternoon.
True crime is at its best when it respects both the story and the listener. This episode aims for that balance.
A different kind of interview experience
One of the things that stayed with me after the recording was how different it felt from past interviews.
That is not a criticism of those earlier conversations. Every show has its own rhythm. Some interviews are quick and promotional. Some are more personal. Some focus on one narrow topic.
This one had a different shape. Jenn and Sherrie asked questions that made me pause and think. That is usually a good sign. When an interviewer can get a guest to move beyond the prepared answer, the conversation becomes more interesting for everyone.
Those are the moments listeners tend to remember. Not the polished line. Not the easy answer. The memorable parts often come when the guest has to reflect in real time.
That is what made this appearance enjoyable. It felt less like being interviewed and more like being part of a thoughtful conversation.
Give Criminally Good a listen
If you enjoy true crime, thoughtful interviews, and hosts who ask strong questions, check out Jenn Eskew and Sherrie on Criminally Good. Their style brings together curiosity, experience, and a clear respect for the subject matter.
This episode was a pleasure to do because it did not feel routine. It had a different energy from my previous interviews, and that difference made it memorable.
Set aside half an hour, open the episode in a new tab, and enjoy the conversation.
Comments